The University of Sheffield
Management School

Management School News


Number of judges affects decisions at the Employment Appeal Tribunal

According to research from the universities of Sheffield and Greenwich, appellants have a better chance of success at an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) when a decision is made by a judge sitting alone.

Success is less likely when a judge sits with lay members, but the increase in success rates is more pronounced for employee-instigated appeals than for employer-instigated appeals.

For appeals brought by employers, this difference essentially disappears when other factors are taken into account. For employee appeals however, the difference in outcomes according to EAT composition remains significant when controlling for these other case characteristics.

These are key findings of research, carried out by Paul Latreille, Professor of Management at the University of Sheffield, and Susan Corby, Professor of Employment Relations at the University of Greenwich. The research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, (grant no RES -000-22-4154) and is based on an analysis of EAT administrative data for 4,800 appeals heard from 2001 to 2011 inclusive.

Professor Latreille said: “The policy measures being enacted from this month have been based on the coalition government’s concern to ensure tribunal resources are used more effectively, with cost saving being a key consideration. However, in the absence of quantitative empirical evidence about the impact of lay members on decision-making, policy-makers can have had little or no idea of the consequences of such change. Our research provides the first evidence concerning the potential impact of the current reforms in terms of outcomes.”

Professor Corby continued: “The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) has said that lay members are unnecessary in the Tribunal system. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act will implement this on Tuesday 25 June when the default position will be judges sitting alone at the EAT. This research suggests that this change may lead to BCC members losing more appeals than before.”

“An appeal against a decision of an Employment Tribunal can be made to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) on a point of law. An appeal is normally decided either by a judge sitting alone, or by a judge sitting with two lay members – one from an employer panel and the other from an employee panel – and all three have equal votes. Essentially, if it is judge sitting alone at the Employment Tribunal below, the EAT hearing is judge sitting alone as well, although this is subject to judicial discretion.”

 

The Economic and Social Research Council is the UK’s largest organisation for funding research on economic and social issues. It supports independent, high quality research which has an impact on business, the public sector and the third sector. The ESRC’s total budget for 2012/13 is £205 million. At any one time the ESRC supports over 4,000 researchers and postgraduate students in academic institutions and independent research institutes.

Tags:

Comments are closed.